@article {2018|2087, title = {The major β-catenin/E-cadherin junctional binding site is a primary molecular mechano-transductor of differentiation .}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 07 19}, abstract = {

, the primary molecular mechanotransductive events mechanically initiating cell differentiation remain unknown. Here we find the molecular stretching of the highly conserved Y654-β-catenin-D665-E-cadherin binding site as mechanically induced by tissue strain. It triggers the increase of accessibility of the Y654 site, target of the Src42A kinase phosphorylation leading to irreversible unbinding. Molecular dynamics simulations of the β-catenin/E-cadherin complex under a force mimicking a 6 pN physiological mechanical strain predict a local 45\% stretching between the two α-helices linked by the site and a 15\% increase in accessibility of the phosphorylation site. Both are quantitatively observed using FRET lifetime imaging and non-phospho Y654 specific antibody labelling, in response to the mechanical strains developed by endogenous and magnetically mimicked early mesoderm invagination of gastrulating embryos. This is followed by the predicted release of 16\% of β-catenin from junctions, observed in FRAP, which initiates the mechanical activation of the β-catenin pathway process.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Armadillo Domain Proteins, Binding Sites, Cadherins, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src), Sequence Homology, Transcription Factors}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.33381}, author = {R{\"o}per, Jens-Christian and Mitrossilis, D{\'e}mosth{\`e}ne and Guillaume Stirnemann and Waharte, Fran{\c c}ois and Brito, Isabel and Fernandez-Sanchez, Maria-Elena and Marc Baaden and Salamero, Jean and Farge, Emmanuel} } @article {2015|1755, title = {How osmolytes influence hydrophobic polymer conformations: A unified view from experiment and theory.}, journal = {Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa}, volume = {112}, year = {2015}, pages = {9270{\textendash}5}, abstract = {

It is currently the consensus belief that protective osmolytes such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) favor protein folding by being excluded from the vicinity of a protein, whereas denaturing osmolytes such as urea lead to protein unfolding by strongly binding to the surface. Despite there being consensus on how TMAO and urea affect proteins as a whole, very little is known as to their effects on the individual mechanisms responsible for protein structure formation, especially hydrophobic association. In the present study, we use single-molecule atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the effects of TMAO and urea on the unfolding of the hydrophobic homopolymer polystyrene. Incorporated with interfacial energy measurements, our results show that TMAO and urea act on polystyrene as a protectant and a denaturant, respectively, while complying with Tanford-Wyman preferential binding theory. We provide a molecular explanation suggesting that TMAO molecules have a greater thermodynamic binding affinity with the collapsed conformation of polystyrene than with the extended conformation, while the reverse is true for urea molecules. Results presented here from both experiment and simulation are in line with earlier predictions on a model Lennard-Jones polymer while also demonstrating the distinction in the mechanism of osmolyte action between protein and hydrophobic polymer. This marks, to our knowledge, the first experimental observation of TMAO-induced hydrophobic collapse in a ternary aqueous system.

}, keywords = {Atomic Force, Computer Simulation, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Mechanical, Methylamines, Methylamines: chemistry, Microscopy, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Normal Distribution, Polymers, Polymers: chemistry, Polystyrenes, Polystyrenes: chemistry, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Proteins, Proteins: chemistry, Software, Solvents, Solvents: chemistry, Stress, Thermodynamics, Urea, Urea: chemistry, Water, Water: chemistry}, isbn = {1215421109}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1511780112}, url = {http://www.pnas.org/content/112/30/9270}, author = {Mondal, Jagannath and Halverson, Duncan and Li, Isaac T S and Guillaume Stirnemann and Walker, Gilbert C and Berne, Bruce J} } @article {2014|1598, title = {A predicted binding site for cholesterol on the GABAA receptor.}, journal = {Biophys. J.}, volume = {106}, number = {9}, year = {2014}, month = {may}, pages = {1938{\textendash}1949}, publisher = {Department of Physics, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, New Jersey; Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, New Jersey. Electronic address: Grace.Brannigan@rutgers.edu.}, abstract = {Modulation of the GABA type A receptor (GABAAR) function by cholesterol and other steroids is documented at the functional level, yet its structural basis is largely unknown. Current data on structurally related modulators suggest that cholesterol binds to subunit interfaces between transmembrane domains of the GABAAR. We construct homology models of a human GABAAR based on the structure of the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluCl of Caenorhabditis elegans. The models show the possibility of previously unreported disulfide bridges linking the M1 and M3 transmembrane helices in the α and γ subunits. We discuss the biological relevance of such disulfide bridges. Using our models, we investigate cholesterol binding to intersubunit cavities of the GABAAR transmembrane domain. We find that very similar binding modes are predicted independently by three approaches: analogy with ivermectin in the GluCl crystal structure, automated docking by AutoDock, and spontaneous rebinding events in unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. Taken together, the models and atomistic simulations suggest a somewhat flexible binding mode, with several possible orientations. Finally, we explore the possibility that cholesterol promotes pore opening through a wedge mechanism.}, keywords = {Amino Acid, Binding Sites, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, chemistry, chemistry/metabolism, Chloride Channels, Cholesterol, GABA-A, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Ivermectin, metabolism, Molecular Docking Simulation, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Porosity, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Sequence Homology, Substrate Specificity}, doi = {10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.024}, author = {J{\'e}r{\^o}me H{\'e}nin and Salari, Reza and Murlidaran, Sruthi and Grace Brannigan} } @article {2014|1645, title = {Type VI secretion and bacteriophage tail tubes share a common assembly pathway.}, journal = {Embo Rep.}, volume = {15}, year = {2014}, month = {mar}, pages = {315{\textendash}21}, abstract = {

The Type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a widespread macromolecular structure that delivers protein effectors to both eukaryotic and prokaryotic recipient cells. The current model describes the T6SS as an inverted phage tail composed of a sheath-like structure wrapped around a tube assembled by stacked Hcp hexamers. Although recent progress has been made to understand T6SS sheath assembly and dynamics, there is no evidence that Hcp forms tubes in vivo. Here we show that Hcp interacts with TssB, a component of the T6SS sheath. Using a cysteine substitution approach, we demonstrate that Hcp hexamers assemble tubes in an ordered manner with a head-to-tail stacking that are used as a scaffold for polymerization of the TssB/C sheath-like structure. Finally, we show that VgrG but not TssB/C controls the proper assembly of the Hcp tubular structure. These results highlight the conservation in the assembly mechanisms between the T6SS and the bacteriophage tail tube/sheath.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Secretion Systems, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Protein Multimerization, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Virulence Factors}, issn = {1469-3178}, doi = {10.1002/embr.201337936}, author = {Brunet, Yannick R and J{\'e}r{\^o}me H{\'e}nin and Celia, Herv{\'e} and Cascales, Eric} } @article {2011|1665, title = {Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology.}, journal = {J. Mol. Biol.}, volume = {414}, year = {2011}, month = {nov}, pages = {289{\textendash}302}, abstract = {

The CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) and CASP (Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) experiments have demonstrated the power of community-wide tests of methodology in assessing the current state of the art and spurring progress in the very challenging areas of protein docking and structure prediction. We sought to bring the power of community-wide experiments to bear on a very challenging protein design problem that provides a complementary but equally fundamental test of current understanding of protein-binding thermodynamics. We have generated a number of designed protein-protein interfaces with very favorable computed binding energies but which do not appear to be formed in experiments, suggesting that there may be important physical chemistry missing in the energy calculations. A total of 28 research groups took up the challenge of determining what is missing: we provided structures of 87 designed complexes and 120 naturally occurring complexes and asked participants to identify energetic contributions and/or structural features that distinguish between the two sets. The community found that electrostatics and solvation terms partially distinguish the designs from the natural complexes, largely due to the nonpolar character of the designed interactions. Beyond this polarity difference, the community found that the designed binding surfaces were, on average, structurally less embedded in the designed monomers, suggesting that backbone conformational rigidity at the designed surface is important for realization of the designed function. These results can be used to improve computational design strategies, but there is still much to be learned; for example, one designed complex, which does form in experiments, was classified by all metrics as a nonbinder.

}, keywords = {Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins}, issn = {1089-8638}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.031}, author = {Fleishman, Sarel J and Whitehead, Timothy A and Strauch, Eva-Maria and Corn, Jacob E and Qin, Sanbo and Zhou, Huan-Xiang and Mitchell, Julie C and Demerdash, Omar N A and Takeda-Shitaka, Mayuko and Terashi, Genki and Moal, Iain H and Li, Xiaofan and Bates, Paul A and Martin Zacharias and Park, Hahnbeom and Ko, Jun-su and Lee, Hasup and Seok, Chaok and Bourquard, Thomas and Bernauer, Julie and Poupon, Anne and Az{\'e}, J{\'e}r{\^o}me and Soner, Seren and Ovali, Sefik Kerem and Ozbek, Pemra and Tal, Nir Ben and Haliloglu, T{\"u}rkan and Hwang, Howook and Vreven, Thom and Pierce, Brian G and Weng, Zhiping and P{\'e}rez-Cano, Laura and Pons, Carles and Fern{\'a}ndez-Recio, Juan and Jiang, Fan and Yang, Feng and Gong, Xinqi and Cao, Libin and Xu, Xianjin and Liu, Bin and Wang, Panwen and Li, Chunhua and Wang, Cunxin and Charles H. Robert and Guharoy, Mainak and Liu, Shiyong and Huang, Yangyu and Li, Lin and Guo, Dachuan and Chen, Ying and Xiao, Yi and London, Nir and Itzhaki, Zohar and Schueler-Furman, Ora and Inbar, Yuval and Potapov, Vladimir and Cohen, Mati and Schreiber, Gideon and Tsuchiya, Yuko and Kanamori, Eiji and Standley, Daron M and Nakamura, Haruki and Kinoshita, Kengo and Driggers, Camden M and Hall, Robert G and Morgan, Jessica L and Hsu, Victor L and Zhan, Jian and Yang, Yuedong and Zhou, Yaoqi and Kastritis, Panagiotis L and Bonvin, Alexandre M J J and Zhang, Weiyi and Camacho, Carlos J and Kilambi, Krishna P and Sircar, Aroop and Gray, Jeffrey J and Ohue, Masahito and Uchikoga, Nobuyuki and Matsuzaki, Yuri and Ishida, Takashi and Akiyama, Yutaka and Khashan, Raed and Bush, Stephen and Fouches, Denis and Tropsha, Alexander and Esquivel-Rodr{\'\i}guez, Juan and Kihara, Daisuke and Stranges, P Benjamin and Jacak, Ron and Kuhlman, Brian and Huang, Sheng-You and Zou, Xiaoqin and Wodak, Shoshana J and Janin, Jo{\"e}l and Baker, David} }